Difference between revisions of "Links on problems in academia"

(Postdocs)
(Fraud and retraction)
Line 62: Line 62:
 
* [http://www.annals.org/content/144/8/609.full Research Misconduct, Retraction, and Cleansing the Medical Literature: Lessons from the Poehlman Case]
 
* [http://www.annals.org/content/144/8/609.full Research Misconduct, Retraction, and Cleansing the Medical Literature: Lessons from the Poehlman Case]
 
* [http://classic.the-scientist.com/blog/display/57449/ 10 retractions and counting]
 
* [http://classic.the-scientist.com/blog/display/57449/ 10 retractions and counting]
 +
* [http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v481/n7379/full/481021a.html#/miguel-roig-teach-scientists-to-paraphrase Fighting plagiarism]
  
 
==Inefficiencies==
 
==Inefficiencies==

Revision as of 13:10, 5 January 2012

This is just a backup of a bookmark folder, will structure it later.

Academic career

Generic

Ph.D.

Postdocs

Coming back

  • Reentering Academia - A Success Story I knew that I could be a reasonable scientist given the chance. I eventually managed to convince people here in Oxford that I could be taken back on as a postdoc.


Finding a job after academia

Academia as a workplace

Fraud and retraction

Inefficiencies

Italy

Open science