Difference between revisions of "Links on problems in academia"

(Funding)
Line 56: Line 56:
 
* [http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/blog/2012/feb/23/scientists-basic-research-business? Scientists have sold their souls – and basic research – to business - Guardian]
 
* [http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/blog/2012/feb/23/scientists-basic-research-business? Scientists have sold their souls – and basic research – to business - Guardian]
 
* [http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v482/n7385/full/nj7385-429a.html#/bx1 Got to get a grant - Nature]
 
* [http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v482/n7385/full/nj7385-429a.html#/bx1 Got to get a grant - Nature]
 +
* [http://the-scientist.com/2012/03/14/slipping-from-the-top/ Slipping from the top - The Scientist]
  
 
==Fraud and retraction==
 
==Fraud and retraction==

Revision as of 16:39, 15 March 2012

This is just a backup of a bookmark folder, will structure it later.

Academic career

Generic

Ph.D.

Postdocs

Coming back

  • Reentering Academia - A Success Story I knew that I could be a reasonable scientist given the chance. I eventually managed to convince people here in Oxford that I could be taken back on as a postdoc.


Finding a job after academia

Academia as a workplace

Funding

Fraud and retraction

Peer review

Plagiarism


Philosophical defenses

Inefficiencies

Italy

Open science

Image