Difference between revisions of "Links on problems in academia"

(Inefficiencies)
(Open science)
Line 141: Line 141:
 
* [http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/17/science/open-science-challenges-journal-tradition-with-web-collaboration.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1&smid=fb-share Cracking Open the Scientific Process]
 
* [http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/17/science/open-science-challenges-journal-tradition-with-web-collaboration.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1&smid=fb-share Cracking Open the Scientific Process]
 
* [http://www.economist.com/node/21552574 Open sesame] - The Economist
 
* [http://www.economist.com/node/21552574 Open sesame] - The Economist
 +
 +
==Open access==
 +
* [http://occamstypewriter.org/scurry/2012/04/01/plos1-public-library-of-sloppiness/ PLOS One public library of sloppiness?]
 +
* [http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2013/06/20/the-rise-and-fall-of-plos-ones-impact-factor-2012-3-730/ The rise and fall of PLOS One IF]
 +
* [http://scientopia.org/blogs/drugmonkey/2013/01/14/placing-plos-one-in-the-appropriate-evaluative-context/ Placing PLOS One in the appropriate evaluative context]
 +
* [http://earlycareerecologists.wordpress.com/2013/03/21/why-i-published-in-plos-one-and-why-i-probably-wont-again-for-awhile/ Why I published in PLOS One and probably won't again]
  
 
==Image==
 
==Image==

Revision as of 04:37, 1 November 2013

This is just a backup of a bookmark folder, will structure it later.

Academic career

Generic

Ph.D.

Postdocs

Coming back

  • Reentering Academia - A Success Story I knew that I could be a reasonable scientist given the chance. I eventually managed to convince people here in Oxford that I could be taken back on as a postdoc.


Finding a job after academia

Academia as a workplace

Funding

Fraud and retraction

Peer review

Impact factor

Plagiarism


Philosophical defenses

Inefficiencies

Italy

Open science

Open access

Image

Other