Difference between revisions of "Links on problems in academia"

(Open access)
(Inefficiencies)
Line 137: Line 137:
 
* http://www.nature.com/news/2010/101013/full/467775a.html?ref=nf
 
* http://www.nature.com/news/2010/101013/full/467775a.html?ref=nf
 
* [http://www.economist.com/news/briefing/21588057-scientists-think-science-self-correcting-alarming-degree-it-not-trouble Unreliable research]
 
* [http://www.economist.com/news/briefing/21588057-scientists-think-science-self-correcting-alarming-degree-it-not-trouble Unreliable research]
 +
* [http://www.nature.com/news/weak-statistical-standards-implicated-in-scientific-irreproducibility-1.14131 Weak statistical standards implicated in scientific irreproducibility]
  
 
==Italy==
 
==Italy==

Revision as of 09:02, 22 November 2013

This is just a backup of a bookmark folder, will structure it later.

Academic career

Generic

Ph.D.

Postdocs

Coming back

  • Reentering Academia - A Success Story I knew that I could be a reasonable scientist given the chance. I eventually managed to convince people here in Oxford that I could be taken back on as a postdoc.


Finding a job after academia

Academia as a workplace

Funding

Publishing

Fraud and retraction

Peer review

Open access

Impact factor

Plagiarism


Philosophical defenses

Inefficiencies

Italy

Open science


Image

Other