Difference between revisions of "Links on problems in academia"

(Funding)
(Peer review)
Line 99: Line 99:
 
* [http://occamstypewriter.org/scurry/2012/04/01/plos1-public-library-of-sloppiness/ Public Library of Sloppiness?]
 
* [http://occamstypewriter.org/scurry/2012/04/01/plos1-public-library-of-sloppiness/ Public Library of Sloppiness?]
 
* [http://blogs.wiley.com/publishingnews/2009/09/21/bentham-affair/ Bentham Affair -sloppy OA]
 
* [http://blogs.wiley.com/publishingnews/2009/09/21/bentham-affair/ Bentham Affair -sloppy OA]
 +
* [http://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/dec/09/nobel-winner-boycott-science-journals Nobel winner declares boycott of top science journals]
  
 
==Open access==
 
==Open access==

Revision as of 10:59, 10 December 2013

This is just a backup of a bookmark folder, will structure it later.

Academic career

Generic

Ph.D.

Postdocs

Coming back

  • Reentering Academia - A Success Story I knew that I could be a reasonable scientist given the chance. I eventually managed to convince people here in Oxford that I could be taken back on as a postdoc.


Finding a job after academia

Academia as a workplace

Funding

Publishing

Fraud and retraction

Peer review

Open access

Impact factor

Plagiarism


Philosophical defenses

Inefficiencies

Italy

Open science


Image

Other