Difference between revisions of "Links on problems in academia"

(Plagiarism)
(Fraud and retraction)
Line 53: Line 53:
  
 
==Fraud and retraction==
 
==Fraud and retraction==
 +
 +
 
* [http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/ Retraction Watch blog]
 
* [http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/ Retraction Watch blog]
 
* [http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2011/11/how-scientific-fraud-is-like-ponzi-finance/247885/ Scientific fraud like Ponzi finance]
 
* [http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2011/11/how-scientific-fraud-is-like-ponzi-finance/247885/ Scientific fraud like Ponzi finance]
Line 61: Line 63:
 
* [http://www.annals.org/content/144/8/609.full Research Misconduct, Retraction, and Cleansing the Medical Literature: Lessons from the Poehlman Case]
 
* [http://www.annals.org/content/144/8/609.full Research Misconduct, Retraction, and Cleansing the Medical Literature: Lessons from the Poehlman Case]
 
* [http://classic.the-scientist.com/blog/display/57449/ 10 retractions and counting]
 
* [http://classic.the-scientist.com/blog/display/57449/ 10 retractions and counting]
 +
 +
===Peer review===
 +
* [http://www.nature.com/nature/peerreview/debate/nature05006.html Quality and value: How can we research peer review?]
  
 
===Plagiarism===
 
===Plagiarism===

Revision as of 08:33, 8 January 2012

This is just a backup of a bookmark folder, will structure it later.

Academic career

Generic

Ph.D.

Postdocs

Coming back

  • Reentering Academia - A Success Story I knew that I could be a reasonable scientist given the chance. I eventually managed to convince people here in Oxford that I could be taken back on as a postdoc.


Finding a job after academia

Academia as a workplace

Fraud and retraction

Peer review

Plagiarism


Philosophical defenses

Inefficiencies

Italy

Open science