Difference between revisions of "Links on problems in academia"

(Fraud and retraction)
(Postdocs)
 
Line 52: Line 52:
 
* [http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200102/cmselect/cmsctech/1046/1046.pdf 2001-2002 UK House of Commons - Short term contracts in academia]
 
* [http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200102/cmselect/cmsctech/1046/1046.pdf 2001-2002 UK House of Commons - Short term contracts in academia]
 
* [http://www.eui.eu/ProgrammesAndFellowships/AcademicCareersObservatory/CareerComparisons/SalaryComparisons.aspx Salary Comparisons in EU] (2007)
 
* [http://www.eui.eu/ProgrammesAndFellowships/AcademicCareersObservatory/CareerComparisons/SalaryComparisons.aspx Salary Comparisons in EU] (2007)
 +
* [http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2014/09/09/345289127/when-scientists-give-up?refresh=true When Scientists Give Up] - stories of successful scientists which left due to lack of funding etc.
  
 
===Coming back===
 
===Coming back===

Latest revision as of 09:46, 11 September 2014

This is just a backup of a bookmark folder, will structure it later.

Academic career

Generic

Ph.D.

Postdocs

Coming back

  • Reentering Academia - A Success Story I knew that I could be a reasonable scientist given the chance. I eventually managed to convince people here in Oxford that I could be taken back on as a postdoc.


Finding a job after academia

Academia as a workplace

Funding

Publishing

Fraud and retraction

Peer review

Open access

Impact factor

Plagiarism

Philosophical defenses

Inefficiencies

Italy

Open science


Image

Other