Difference between revisions of "Links on problems in academia"

(Fraud and retraction)
(Open science)
Line 124: Line 124:
 
* http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2011/may/22/open-science-shared-research-internet
 
* http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2011/may/22/open-science-shared-research-internet
 
* [http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/17/science/open-science-challenges-journal-tradition-with-web-collaboration.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1&smid=fb-share Cracking Open the Scientific Process]
 
* [http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/17/science/open-science-challenges-journal-tradition-with-web-collaboration.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1&smid=fb-share Cracking Open the Scientific Process]
 +
* [http://www.economist.com/node/21552574 Open sesame] - The Economist
  
 
==Image==
 
==Image==

Revision as of 16:23, 19 April 2012

This is just a backup of a bookmark folder, will structure it later.

Academic career

Generic

Ph.D.

Postdocs

Coming back

  • Reentering Academia - A Success Story I knew that I could be a reasonable scientist given the chance. I eventually managed to convince people here in Oxford that I could be taken back on as a postdoc.


Finding a job after academia

Academia as a workplace

Funding

Fraud and retraction

Peer review

Impact factor

Plagiarism


Philosophical defenses

Inefficiencies

Italy

Open science

Image