Difference between revisions of "Links on problems in academia"

(Ph.D.)
(Fraud and retraction)
Line 98: Line 98:
 
* [http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/17/science/rise-in-scientific-journal-retractions-prompts-calls-for-reform.html?_r=2&pagewanted=1 A Sharp Rise in Retractions Prompts Calls for Reform]
 
* [http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/17/science/rise-in-scientific-journal-retractions-prompts-calls-for-reform.html?_r=2&pagewanted=1 A Sharp Rise in Retractions Prompts Calls for Reform]
 
* [http://boingboing.net/2012/10/11/fraud-failure-and-fubar-in-s.html Fraud, Failure and FUBAR]
 
* [http://boingboing.net/2012/10/11/fraud-failure-and-fubar-in-s.html Fraud, Failure and FUBAR]
 +
* [http://www.nature.com/news/research-integrity-cell-induced-stress-1.15507 Cell-induced stress] - a recap of the Japanese stem-cell fiasco
  
 
===Peer review===
 
===Peer review===

Revision as of 07:25, 14 July 2014

This is just a backup of a bookmark folder, will structure it later.

Academic career

Generic

Ph.D.

Postdocs

Coming back

  • Reentering Academia - A Success Story I knew that I could be a reasonable scientist given the chance. I eventually managed to convince people here in Oxford that I could be taken back on as a postdoc.


Finding a job after academia

Academia as a workplace

Funding

Publishing

Fraud and retraction

Peer review

Open access

Impact factor

Plagiarism

Philosophical defenses

Inefficiencies

Italy

Open science


Image

Other